BREEDING CONDITIONS REPORT, 2000


RESPONDENT

Vladimir Morozov

SITE NAME

Usa River upper reaches, the Polar Urals, Russia

Contact details (phone/fax//e-mail//address):
(495)1553044 // piskulka@mtu-net.ru // Shebashevski Proezd, 7-16, Moscow, 125315, Russia

PROJECT DETAILS

Project name:

Studies of the Lesser White-fronted Goose

Start of survey:

End of survey: Team size:

18.06

26.08

3


WEATHER CONDITIONS

Season phenology: early

Weather conditions:

Precipitation in winter was not abundant, and locally on watersheds snow was completely removed by wind. This accounted for quick and early snowmelt followed by early and rapid spring. By mid May snowcover was about 50%, but remained only in river floodplains and cloughs. Snow melted off completely by early June. Rivers broke on 20-25 May. Flood was low and riverbanks did not come under water. Lakes became ice-free by 10-15 June. All phenological events (plant vegetation, appearance and flying of insect) were 3-4 weeks earlier than normal. Summer was also warm and dry, without weather anomalies.

 

Season temperature: warm
Season humidity: dry
Date of 50% snow-cover: 15-20 May
Date of ice-break on rivers: 20-25 May
Date of final loss of snow: 1-3 June

BIOTIC CONDITIONS

Rodents abundance evaluation:

low

Breeding conditions:

Predator numbers were very low. Red Foxes were not met, barking Arctic Fox was heard only once. Brown bears were seen twice and their tracks were encountered regularily.
Numbers of most rodent-specialized avian predators were low as well. Owls were not recorded, Rough-legged Buzzards and Northern Harriers were rare, and mostly wandering birds. Long-tailed Skuas were encountered more often, usually in groups. Absolute majority of these birds did not breed, with exception of two small localities, at one of which we found buzzard nest with almost fledged chick, two pairs of harriers near nests and one pair of Long-tailed Skuas with young. Another locality was populated with few pairs of Long-tailed Skuas, one of which had nest with a single chick.
Due to low predation and favourable weather conditions in spring and summer numbers of waders alarming near broods were high, and broods usually contained 3-4 chicks, which is indicative of successful breeding. Wood Sandpiper, Terek Sandpiper and Great Snipe were particularly abundant. Interestingly, Golden Plover and Dotterel had low densities, but nesting success was still high in the former species.
 

Rodent dynamics:

Small mammals' populations remained in depression during the whole period from spring to autumn. Lemmings were not recorded, few Narrow-skulled Voles and shrews were only found in August at some small in area localities.

Rodent species recorded:

LatinAbundance

Summary of fauna studies:

 

FAUNA IN STUDY AREA

Group of speciesPresenceAbundanceBreedingDetailed studiesComment
arctic foxesYesrare  once heard
lemmingsNo    
volesYesrare   
wadersYesabundantfledging  
geeseYesrarefledging  
ducksYescommonfledging  
birds of preyYesrarefledging  
buzzardsYesrarefledging one pair
ptarmigansYesrarefledging  
skuasYesrarehatching  
gulls/ternsYesrarefledging  
owlsNo    
passerinesYesabundantfledging  
red foxesNo    
brown bearsYescommon   
shrewsYesrare   

 

SEABIRD COLONIES

speciesComment

 

WATERBIRD NON-BREEDING AGGREGATIONS

speciesAggregation typeNumberComment

 

HUMAN ACTIVITY IN THE STUDY AREA

Human activityComment
reindeer herding 
seasonal fishing/hunting 
vicinities of a permanent human settlement 

 


Recommended citation

Morozov, V.V. (2000). Breeding conditions report for Usa River upper reaches, the Polar Urals, Russia, 2000. ARCTIC BIRDS: an international breeding conditions survey. (Online database). Eds. M.Soloviev, P.Tomkovich. . Updated 11 Dec. 2008. Accessed .

 more on citation guidelines

 

HOME PAGE